ABSTRACT
Background. Significant gaps are present in the evidence of the spectrum and severity of COVID-19 infection in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Patients with IIMs typically require immunosuppressive therapy, may have multiple disease sequelae, and frequent comorbidities, and thus may be more susceptible to severe COVID-19 infection and complications. The possibility of attenuated immunogenicity and reduced efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines due to concomitant immunosuppressive medication is a major concern in these patients, and there is little data available on COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections (BI) in IIMs Methods. We developed an extensive patient self-reporting electronic-survey (COVAD survey) featuring 36 questions to collect respondent demographics, SAID details, COVID-19 infection history, COVID-19 vaccination details, 7-day post vaccination adverse events and patient reported outcome measures using the PROMIS tool. After pilot testing, validation, translation into 18 languages on the online platform surveymonkey.com, and vetting by international experts, the COVAD survey was circulated in early 2021 by a multicenter study group of >110 collaborators in 94 countries. BI was defined as COVID-19 infection occurring more than 2 weeks after receiving 1st dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. We analysed data from the baseline survey for descriptive and intergroup comparative statistics based on data distribution and variable type. Results. Data from 10,900 respondents [42 (30-55) years, 74% females, 45% Caucasians] were analysed. Most were HCs (47%), followed by SAIDs (42%) and IIMs (11%). All respondents included in the final analysis had received a single dose of the vaccine and 69% had received 2 primary doses. Pfizer (39.8%) was the most common vaccine received, followed by Oxford/AstraZeneca (13.4%), and Covishield (10.9%). IIM patients were older, had a higher Caucasian representation and higher Pfizer uptake than other SAIDs, and HC. A higher proportion of IIM patients received immunosuppressants than other SAIDs. After adjustment for covariates, COVID-19 severity and BIs were comparable among patients with IIMs, SAIDs, and HCs, except for all-cause hospitalisation prior to vaccination (IIMs vs. HCs, OR=2.5, 95%CI 1.1-5.8) and COVID-19 cases prior to vaccination (IIMs vs. SAIDs, OR=0.6, 95%CI 0.4-0.8, and IIMs vs HCs, OR=0.4, 95%CI 0.3-0.5). BIs in IIMs were uncommon, with only 17 (1.4%) patients reporting BIs, of whom 13 were on immunosuppressants, and 3 required hospitalisation. Unvaccinated individuals with IIMs were at 4.6 (95%CI 2.7-8.0) times higher odds for developing COVID-19, and the 2nd vaccine dose had a protective effect on BI occurrence (Figure 1). Conclusion. IIMs patients reported fewer COVID-19 prior to vaccination than SAIDs and HCs, but had higher odds of all-cause hospitalisation than HCs. Vaccination protected patients with IIMs against COVID-19. COVID-19 breakthrough infections were uncommon in IIMs, with a similar symptom profile, disease duration, and severity in comparison to patients with SAIDs and HCs.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Keloids of the head and neck can result in significant disfigurement and psychological stress. Here we report a novel case of keloid formation at a well-healed postauricular incision presenting after a year of daily ear loop mask use and discuss unique considerations for management. Method(s): This is a retrospective case review of a 35-year-old African American man with Klinefelter syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and a history of hypertrophic scar formation who presented to otology clinic in 2015 with chronic left otitis media and cholesteatoma. He underwent left tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy in 2016 through a postauricular incision 1 cm posterior to retroauricular sulcus in a standard fashion. In 2018, the patient was noted to have a hypertrophic scar without extension beyond the borders of the incision that was stable until 2021. Result(s): In 2021, the patient was noted to develop a 12A 7-cm postauricular keloid in the setting of mechanical irritation from his mask worn throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the disfiguring cosmesis and resulting challenges securing an ear loop mask, he elected to undergo complete excision of the postauricular keloid with tension-free primary closure of the wound, intralesional corticosteroid injection (triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/mL), and pressure dressing. The patient was counseled on options for mask wearing to avoid contact with the postauricular incision. Conclusion(s): When designing postauricular incisions in patients prone to hypertrophic scar or keloid formation, the point of postauricular contact of ear loop masks is a novel consideration to minimize risk of future pressure-related injury. Counseling on alternative face masks that tie behind the head or anchoring ear loops to buttons sewn onto a hat or headband are other preventative pressures.
ABSTRACT
Background: Signifcant gaps are present in the evidence of the spectrum and severity of COVID-19 infection in idiopathic infammatory myopathies (IIM). IIM patients typically require immunosuppressive therapy, may have multiple disease sequelae, and frequent comorbidities, and thus may be more susceptible to severe COVID-19 infection and complications (1). The possibility of attenuated immunogenicity and reduced efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines due to concomitant immunosuppressive medication is a major concern in these patients, and there is little data available on COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections (BI) in IIM (2). Objectives: This study aimed to compare disease spectrum and severity and COVID-19 BI in patients with IIM, other systemic autoimmune and infammatory diseases (SAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: We developed an extensive self-reporting electronic-survey (COVAD survey) featuring 36 questions to collect respondent demographics, SAID details, COVID-19 infection history, COVID-19 vaccination details, 7-day post vaccination adverse events and patient reported outcome measures using the PROMIS tool. After pilot testing, validation, translation into 18 languages on the online platform surveymonkey.com, and vetting by international experts, the COVAD survey was circulated in early 2021 by a multicenter study group of >110 collaborators in 94 countries. BI was defned as COVID-19 infection occurring more than 2 weeks after receiving 1st or 2nd dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. We analyzed data from the baseline survey for descriptive and intergroup comparative statistics based on data distribution and variable type. Results: 10900 respondents [mean age 42 (30-55) years, 74% females and 45% Caucasians] were analyzed. 1,227 (11.2%) had IIM, 4,640 (42.6%) had other SAIDs, and 5,033 (46.2%) were HC. All respondents included in the fnal analysis had received a single dose of the vaccine and 69% had received 2 primary doses. Pfzer (39.8%) was the most common vaccine received, followed by Oxford/AstraZeneca (13.4%), and Covishield (10.9%). IIM patients were older, had a higher Caucasian representation and higher Pfzer uptake than other SAIDs, and HC. A higher proportion of IIM patients received immu-nosuppressants than other SAIDs. IIMs were at a lower risk of symptomatic pre-vaccination COVID-19 infection compared to SAIDs [multivariate OR 0.6 (0.4-0.8)] and HCs [multivariate OR 0.39 (0.28-0.54)], yet at a higher risk of hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared to SAIDs [univariate OR 2.3 (1.2-3.5)] and HCs [multivariate OR 2.5 (1.1-5.8)]. BIs were very uncommon in IIM patients, with only 17 (1.4%) reporting BI. IIM patients were at a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 prior to vaccination than ≤2 weeks of vaccination [univariate OR 8 (4.1-15)] or BI [univariate OR 4.6 (2.7-8.0)]. BIs were equally severe compared to when they occurred prior to vaccination in IIMs, and were comparable between IIM, SAIDs, and HC (Figure 1), though BI disease duration was shorter in IIMs than SAIDs (7 vs 11 days, p 0.027). 13/17 IIM patients with BI were on immunosuppressants. Conclusion: IIM patients experienced COVID-19 infection less frequently prior to vaccination but were at a higher risk of hospitalization and requirement for oxygen therapy compared with patients with HC. Breakthrough COVID-19 infections were rare (1.4%) in vaccinated IIM patients, and were similar to HC and SAIDs, except for shorter disease duration in IIM.